THE
CONSTRUCTION ACT 1996
INCLUDING THE DIRTY TRICKS, DODGES AND LOOPHOLES USED BY SOME
CLIENTS AND BUILDERS
SUB-CONTRACTORS BEWARE!
READ ON FOR THE BENEFITS AND THE RISKS !
THE CONSTRUCTION ACT
1996
INCLUDING THE TRICKS, DODGES
AND LOOPHOLES USED BY CLIENTS AND BUILDERS
Click on the underlined hyperlinks as required.
Then click “Back to contents” for your next target.
Government
Scheme for Adjudication
Payment
- Dirty tricks, dodges and loopholes
Adjudication
– Dirty tricks, dodges and loopholes
The Construction Act 1996 came into force on 1 May 1998, with the aim of reducing confrontation, and
facilitating better cash flow and fair play. Almost four years later- and how do things look now?
Many clients and main contractors
(ie “Builders”) have
genuinely tried to enshrine the on Act into their sub-contract conditions.
Others have gone to considerable lengths to evade the spirit, and often the letter, of the legislation.
The streetwise subbie
must be on the lookout for these
evasions and breaches. The time for maximum vigilance is at enquiry stage, when
it is still possible to object and to negotiate more equitable terms which
respect the Act. To assist in this aim, I summarise below (in
very brief terms) the key elements of the Act, some of the principal “tricks and dodges”
employed by clients and contractors, and the potential dangers to the subbie.
THE “HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996”
CAME INTO FORCE ON ALL NEW “CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS” ENTERED INTO AFTER 1 MAY 1998. THE ACT INTRODUCES SIGNIFICANT REFORMS , ARISING FROM THE “LATHAM” INITIATIVE. THESE
REFORMS FALL UNDER TWO PRIME HEADINGS, NAMELY:
“PAYMENT” and “ADJUDICATION”.
THE ACT
COVERS ALL NORMAL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS INCLUDING
LABOUR ONLY, SITE CLEARANCE, DEMOLITION, REPAIR WORKS, LANDSCAPING ETC.
THE ACT EXCLUDES SUPPLY ONLY, OFF SITE MANUFACTURE, SUPPLY AND FIXING OF PLANT IN
PROCESS INDUSTRIES, , CONTRACTS WITH RESIDENTIAL OCCUPIERS, CONTRACTS NOT IN
WRITING, PFI CONTRACTS (BUT NOT THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS ENTERED INTO
PURSUANT TO THEM), AND CERTAIN OTHER DEFINITIONS.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF
THE ACT :
EVERY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS :
PAYMENT BY
INSTALMENTS
“ADEQUATE MECHANISM”
FOR DETERMINING SUMS DUE AND WHEN
PRIOR NOTICE OF SUMS
DUE AND MAKE UP
PRIOR NOTICE OF
INTENTION WITHHOLD PAYMENT, GIVING GROUNDS AND AMOUNTS (IE “SET OFF”)
SUSPENSION OF WORK
(BY SEVEN DAYS NOTICE) FOR NON-PAYMENT OF SUMS “DUE”
“PAY WHEN PAID”
CLAUSES OUTLAWED. THE EXCEPTION IS WHERE A THIRD PARTY UPON WHOM PAYMENT DEPENDS, BECOMES INSOLVENT (IE THE END CLIENT).
IF MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS NOT MET, GOVERNMENT SCHEME COMES INTO
OPERATION AS A “DEFAULT” MECHANISM.
GOVERNMENT SCHEME FOR
PAYMENT PROVIDES FOR :
MONTHLY INTERIM
PAYMENT
DUE DATE” FOR INTERIM
PAYMENTS 7 DAYS AFTER END OF RELEVANT MONTHLY PERIOD
OR MAKING OF
CLAIM, WHICHEVER THE LATER.
FINAL DATE FOR
INTERIM PAYMENT 17 DAYS FROM DUE DATE
NOTICE OF AMOUNT DUE
NOT LATER THAN 5 DAYS AFTER DUE DATE
NOTICE OF INTENTION
TO WITHHOLD PAYMENT NOT LATER THAN 7 DAYS BEFORE FINAL PAYMENT DATE
STATUTORY RIGHT TO REFER “ANY DISPUTE” TO ADJUDICATION. ALL
CONTRACTS MUST CONTAIN AN ADJUDICATION PROCEDURE WHICH COMPLIES WITH THE ACT.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT :
EITHER PARTY CAN GIVE
NOTICE OF ADJUDICATION “AT ANY TIME” REGARDING ANY DISPUTE OR DIFFERENCE
ARISING UNDER THE CONTRACT.
CONTRACT MUST PROVIDE
A TIMETABLE FOR APPOINTMENT OF ADJUDICATOR AND REFERRAL OF DISPUTE WITHIN 7
DAYS OF INITIAL NOTICE
ADJUDICATOR MUST
REACH DECISION WITHIN 28 DAYS OF REFERRAL (UP TO 42 DAYS IF THE REFERRING PARTY
AGREES)
PERIOD CAN BE
EXTENDED ONLY IF PARTIES AGREE, OR
ADJUDICATOR’S INSTIGATION WITH CONSENT OF REFERRING PARTY
ADJUDICATOR IS
ENABLED TO TAKE THE INITIATIVE IN ASCERTAINING
FACTS AND LAW
DECISION OF THE
ADJUDICATOR MUST BE “BINDING UNTIL THE DISPUTE IS FINALLY DETERMINED BY LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS, BY ARBITRATION .......OR BY AGREEMENT”.
THE PARTIES MAY AGREE
TO ACCEPT THE ADJUDICATOR'S DECISION AS FINAL
IF MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
NOT MET, GOVERNMENT SCHEME COMES INTO OPERATION AS A “DEFAULT”
MECHANISM.
GOVERNMENT SCHEME FOR
ADJUDICATION PROVIDES FOR :
WRITTEN NOTICE OF ADJUDICATION
STATING :
Nature and description of dispute and parties involved
Details of where and when dispute has arisen
Nature of redress sought
Names and addresses of parties to
contract
APPOINTMENT OF ADJUDICATOR - WITHIN 7 DAYS OF NOTICE
THE SAME 7 DAYS IN
WHICH TO SUBMIT FULL DOCUMENTATION (“REFERRAL
NOTICE”)
ORAL EVIDENCE LIMITED
TO ONE REPRESENTATIVE - CAN BE A
“LAWYER”
ADJUDICATOR’S
DECISION WITHIN 28 DAYS FROM “REFERRAL NOTICE”
OR 42 DAYS WITH THE
REFERRING PARTY’S PERMISSION
PAYMENT OF THE
ADJUDICATOR’S FEES : PARTIES EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE IF NOT DETERMINED BY
ADJUDICATOR
REASONS FOR ADJUDICATOR’S AWARD TO BE PROVIDED IF
REQUESTED
DECISION BINDING
PENDING FINAL DETERMINATION BY LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OR ARBITRATION, OR BY MUTUAL
AGREEMENT IN SETTLEMENT.
PARTIES TO COMPLY
WITH HIS DECISION “IMMEDIATELY”.
"Adjudication" is not to be confused with
"arbitration".
Adjudication is intended to
be quicker and less expensive. Therefore the parties must be prepared for a degree of "rough
justice". The adjudicator has very
wide powers. He can use his initiative
and can request further documents from any party, meet and question them, visit
site, appoint experts to help him if necessary (eg technical assessors, legal
advisers etc), issue directions and timescales. He can adjudicate, with the consent of all parties, on “related
disputes” under different contracts. He
can award interest.
What kinds of dispute
or difference?
Virtually all kinds
of dispute or difference may be referred to the Adjudicator, provided they
arise “under the contract”.
These would include :
failure to issue notice of sums due or notice of withholding payment, value of
interim payments, value of variations, extension of time, loss and expense, set
off and contra charges, workmanship, whether or not an instruction is
reasonable etc.
The parties' own costs.
Initial view was that each party must bear his own costs in
submitting and presenting his case.
However, a recent court case supported a “costs paid by loser” approach.
This raises worrying questions as to “cost of big guns”.
Enforcement of the adjudicator’s decision
The adjudicator’s decision is intended to be binding pending final
determination by legal proceedings or arbitration, or by mutual agreement in
settlement. Whilst the act is not as
strong as might be desired, several court cases have shown that the courts
intend to support both the act and the
adjudicator by enforcing awards.
Beneficial effect of an adjudication clause
It may well be that the mere presence of an adjudication resource
will concentrate the minds of those on
either side whose stance is less than reasonable -
And so enable the parties to go forward with providing the client’s
end product - the completed project - on time and free of major end of job disputes!
Sub-sub-contractors
The Act applies
equally to the sub-sub-subbie (eg the cable puller etc) even when the
sub-subbie is “labour only”, and regardless of job value. So the subbie needs to make sure that he
does not put himself in a vulnerable position.
The sub-subbie is entitled to be treated in the same way as everybody
else, and is quite likely to refer to Adjudication in the event of perceived
injustice. This means that the subbie must take care to issue the appropriate
notices of sums due for payment, and notices of withholding monies. These
notices must be issued within the timescales stipulated in the sub-subbie
conditions and/or in accordance with the government scheme. The days have gone when a subbie could just
sit on a cabler’s account, on some vague pretext.
Mini claims
The days of leaving claims
to the end of the job are over.
Disputes must be “nipped in the bud”, by use of the procedures available
under the Act. This will probably mean
the submission of “mini claims” as the job proceeds. So records and notices
must be maintained to a high standard, in readiness for production to the
Adjudicator. The result should be better cash flow.
|
DIRTY TRICKS AND DODGES |
JR COMMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many sub-contractors re stating long periods
of 60 days from due date to final date.
Some are stating 90 days. |
Now that “pay when paid” is outlawed,
contractors are imposing greatly lengthened
payment periods., in order to retain their grip on money due to subbies,
which has already been paid to them by the client. A payment period of 90 days means that
a subbie will have been working for over 4 months before he sees any payment
whatever. For many subbies, this
could mean bankruptcy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set off notice Many contractors stating only one days notice
of set off prior to final date for payment |
Although government scheme states 7 days, the act does not prescribe a
period. Clearly, one days notice of
set off, with all its potential impact upon cash flow, is totally inadequate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||