THE NEC CONTRACT
THE ENGINEERING
AND CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT
John Russell FCIOB
Contracts and Training Consultant
Cheshire CW4 7DP
Tel: 07770 986444
Email: swsubbie@globalnet.co.uk
Web site: www.jrconsultant.co.uk
THE NEC CONTRACT
THE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT
(Click
on the hyperlink to go to selected section)
· Client dissatisfaction with existing forms - too
many, too adversarial
· Inflexibility of existing contracts
· Disputes - too many, too expensive, too long to
settle
· Management of contracts seen as more important
than legal niceties
· UK now part of Europe - distinctions disappearing
· Clients sought alternative procurement strategies
The New Engineering Contract was devised on the
initiative of the Institution of Civil
Engineers, and first published in 1993.
The Latham
report of 1994 then recommended that the NEC should become a national
standard contract across the whole of the construction industry.
In response, the ICE introduced various changes
as recommended in the report, resulting in the publication of the second
edition (re-titled “The Engineering and
Construction Contract“).
One such recommendation was for a requirement of
the parties to work “in a spirit of mutual trust and
co-operation”.
So now we have the ECC which, together with the Construction
Bill, seeks to reduce the unacceptable level of confrontation within the construction industry, and to encourage
all concerned to “get on with the job”.
The authors make some bold claims for the ECC. These include :
· Intended to be suitable for all the needs of the
construction industry.
· Provides for a variety of approaches to risk
allocation.
· Adaptable for some design, full design or no
design responsibility, and for all current contract options including target ,
management and cost reimbursable contracts.
International application
The simple
wording of the documents is deliberately
chosen, and lends itself to ready translation
into other languages.
Clarity and simplicity
· The overall structure is quite unlike that of the
JCT and other standard forms.
· The ECC is written in ordinary language, using short sentences with bullet points.
· Imprecise terms
such as “fair” and “reasonable” have been avoided.
· Legal
jargon is
minimised.
· The actions required from the parties are said to
be “defined precisely”, with the aim
of avoiding disputes.
· Flow
charts are
provided to assist usage.
This is stated to be the most important
characteristic of the ECC.
· The ECC is a
manual of management procedures, not just a contractual document.
· The ECC is NOT
something you lock in the safe and look at only if you have a problem.
· The aim is to present the Purchaser’s Project
Manager with options for overcoming problems as they become
apparent.
· An “Early
warning procedure” places
obligations on all parties to flag up problems which could affect time, money
or performance of the works.
· “Compensation
events” are the
method of dealing with problems of both time and money.
· “Actual
cost” is
used.
· Changes are based on quotations prior to commitment wherever possible.
· Greater financial
control is therefore enabled.
· Programme must be kept up to date at all times, to reflect
changes.
· The aim is to
highlight and resolve problems in a proactive way as the job proceeds.
· “End
of job” disputes
should be reduced in consequence.
The full range of documents comes in a handsome
box, and the contents include guidance
notes, main and sub-contract conditions, flow charts and various “options” such as a
management contract, priced with
activity schedule, priced with bill of quantities, target contract, and a cost reimbursable contract.
Core clauses
There are nine
sections of core clauses - which apply to all contracts, plus
a range of optional clauses to suit specific situations.
Options.
There are six
main payment options A -F, plus secondary
options G - Z, any combination of which can be selected. (See below).
The most common formats will probably be Option A
“Conventional contract with activity schedule” and Option B “Conventional Contract with Bill of
Quantities”.
The secondary
options include such elements as advance
payments, sectional completion, bonus for early completion, delay damages.
Schedule of cost components
There is a “Schedule of cost components” which
defines “actual costs” by definition.
This is NOT a priced schedule.
The idea seems to be to present a “mix and match”
scenario, so that the Purchaser can
choose from the various options in order to achieve the most advantageous contractual
arrangements for the particular project.
Contract data
There is “Contract data” which acts as a highly detailed “appendix” for the
parties to enter specific information in the tender document (eg price, dates, periods, parties,
functions, etc).
SIX MAIN OPTIONS A - F
(A)
Lump sum with activity schedule
(B)
Priced contract with Bill of Quantities
(Note - the bill is used only for interim payments, not for valuation of compensation events).
(C)
Target contract with activity schedule
(Lump
sum quoted by tenderer as target)
(D)
Target contract with Bill of Quantities
(Subject
to remeasurement)
(E)
Cost reimbursable contract
(F) Management
contract (By involvement of a
management contractor).
Note:
Construction management can be used, in which case each contractor has direct NEC contract with Purchaser
G and H
Provide for
Performance bond, or parent company guarantee etc.
J
Allows
for advance payments
K
Provides
for multiple currencies - international use.
L
Sectional
completion
M
Limits
design responsibility to reasonable skill and care
N
Formula
price adjustment
P
Retention
is an option, not a core clause
Q
Bonus
for early finish
R
Delay
damages
S
Low
performance damages
T
Changes
in law which become compensation events